Rare Rape Pic Why Rape Was Not That Common In Ancient Wars?
Why rape was not that common in ancient wars? - rare rape pic
In the former war not, do not oblige the invaders, mass rape, if the offense was committed, it just happened from time to time
In ancient times, is not uncommon for invaders to rape all the women who work in one place.
Am I right? If I'm right, why do not people do things in the past, as now, often in wars?
|
9 comments:
Hello
I seriously check your sources ...
Wartime antiques, mass rape, slavery and slaughter were the losers could expect
In the Hebrew Bible, the rape of women conquered tribes described as routine. A strange woman were often kidnapped as spoils of war and forced to marry their captors / rapists. That was probably the typical behavior of the Middle East during this period. In ancient times, rape is a crime against the father of the victim or the spouse - the property. "The ancient Greeks and Romans, rape and enslavement of women after the conquest of the city."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_ ...
An injury during the war, back data even in antiquity, old enough to be mentioned in the Bible. Greek, Persian and Roman troops, the rape of women and children used in the conquered peoples.
Notice of offense in addition to the war, was banned by the military code of Richard II and Henry V (1385 and 1419, respectively). These laws form the basis of conviction,Ting and the execution of rapists during the Hundred Years War (1337-1453).
Napoleon Bonaparte is rape committed by soldiers, particularly unpleasant. During his expedition to Egypt, said that "everywhere, the rapist is a monster," and ordered that "every person guilty of rape should be shot
In an ancient time of the first references to "laws of war" or "traditions of war" was Cicero, who invited the soldiers to respect the rules of war and to comply with the rules in order to separate the "men's" gross ". The pursuit of wealth and possessions of the enemy was considered a legitimate reason for war. The women were included in the "property" because they believe that under the protection of property rights, whether a father, husband, slave, or guardian. In this context, the rape of a woman as a crime against property, against the man and the woman was committed. In war, the rape of women in ancient Greece as "a socially acceptable rules of war" w timesarrior than women 's remains legitimate, valuable as wives, concubines, slaves or trophy battlefield. "To the victor will win" was a rallying cry for centuries women have been included as part of the spoils of war.
We recommend a little more for a view, and when a teacher told him that this waste, you're fired
It was the modern history in which rape is better documented, then for the soldiers who were for the most part. In my textbook of modern history, a diary of a young girl, that was a sex slave during the war is, was not a decision that had soldiers rape and beat her. But what has happened deffintly in ancient times, but not many people could write again and had more important things like the right way to your great country and all the wonderful things that was their leader.
Today, people are sick, listen more, because women have rights now. In ancient times, was mainly due to high fees or people in the government, the raped women.
I believe that human nature does not change too much, and I dare say that the soldiers, the women of conquered peoples in ancient times, as they have raped always done. Be given the frequency with which the British islands were occupied by an example that a fair amount of rape has been going on here. The British women were raped by Roman soldiers (like Boadicea were girls, for example) and later by the Saxons. So probably Saxon women raped by the Vikings and Normans. I have Scottish and Irish descent on my father and I would not be surprised if some of my Irish ancestors were raped by the Vikings, then the British. And fight my experience in Scotland is still the war of the clans, and so on rape, dare I say it has happened between them.
That is not true (as some previous comments have suggested), that men are always welcome, away with the rape of women in peacetime. Most societies have laws against rape, and men could be punished for raping women in their own society. But in times of war the laws are on your side, and rapeWomen, the enemy can not be viewed in the same manner as the rape of a woman from his own people.
It happened .. But women have fewer rights than now .. this matter, as real people .. I guess that's why most of the mass rapes were covered up .. Today, women know that if someone is using sexual violence against them .. and I am sure that the 20th Century was raped more mass .. in wars than ever before .. But it also happened in ancient times ...
In war, the rape of women in ancient Greece as "a socially acceptable rules of war times, and beaten as the warriors' booty legitimate, useful as wives, concubines, slaves or trophy battlefield." To the victor will win "was a rallying cry For centuries women have been included as part of the spoils of war.
In the Middle Ages until the 19th Century, this attitude and the prevailing practices and legal protection of women in the war directly to the legal protection of women in terms were granted in peacetime. In medieval Europe, women were considered inferior by the law
The injury was not noticed until then, because we are different kind of story.
The injury was not recorded in the accounts of old wars, because it was part of the "political history", as the written history and the second was more about politics and war, war as a look at chess in nature. Now we have a different opinion - the most in the history of "social" - and therefore more appropriate to describe the lives of ordinary people, and raped civilians during the war.
Peter, I'm sorry to say, but not perfect. The injury was a part of the fruits of war for centuries.
The Greeks, Romans and Persian troops systematically women and even small children in the conquered peoples raped. In the 8th Century, the Vikings have committed the act in England during the years of plunder. During the Crusades, was used as a tool! In the sixteenth century, the commentator, Francisco de Victoria, suggested that rape in war may be necessary for the execution of the war and as a spur to the courage of the troops "
We must remember, too, are sexual slavery in the equation, because it is considered rape. See article below ... its very good.
Who said it did not happen? The fact that (the official historians are) usually a point or an employer not covered in detail, does not mean that it happened.
(Ancient History and Modern) is painfully full looting incidents in the city were burned, their inhabitants killed or sold into slavery. Do you believe that people can do to draw the line into the breach? War is human nature at its worst, and I fear that the rape.
Read the source for Michna. The rape was so common as looting, and expect all sides. The war was more brutal in our history, no newspapers and journalists to monitor and assess the events that had everything you can imagine the terrible happened, and often no one left to accept as a witness, the winners
Read the source for Michna. The rape was so common as looting, and expect all sides. The war was more brutal in our history, no newspapers and journalists to monitor and assess the events that had everything you can imagine the terrible happened, and often no one left to accept as a witness, the winners
Post a Comment